Desk step three

In contrast to standards, yet not, and also in contrast to what has been discovered into the lookup towards relationship relationship (DeWall ainsi que al., 2011), own attachment prevention try not related to possess cheating. It null feeling didn’t differ across the husbands and you may wives, B = ?0.46, SE = 0.40, t(393) = ?step one.14, p = .25, both studies, B = 0.62, SE = 0.forty two, t(393) = step 1.forty, p = .sixteen, and/or attrition dummy-password, B = 0.47, SE = 0.53, t(393) = 0.89, p = .37, and you can stayed non-high when mate connection nervousness and you can cures just weren’t regulated, B = 0.03, SE = 0.24, t(399) = 0.11, p = .91. Notably, low power do not establish why connection prevention was not certainly related that have individual cheating because guidelines of your non-significant perception try bad.

In keeping with requirement, lover’s attachment nervousness are undoubtedly of this own unfaithfulness, proving that people having partners who have been packed with connection nervousness had been likely to take part in cheating. It feeling didn’t differ around the husbands and you can spouses, B = 0.19, SE = 0.58, t(393) = 0.33, p = .75, both degree, B = ?0.02, SE = 0.40, t(393) = ?0.05, p = .96, or perhaps the attrition dummy-code, B = ?0.48, SE = 0.sixty, t(393) = ?0.80, p = .42.

In contrast to expectations, partner’s attachment avoidance was negatively associated with own infidelity, indicating that spouses with partners who were high in attachment avoidance were less likely to engage in infidelity. Specifically, people who had partners who scored one point higher than the mean on the attachment avoidance subscale were .45 times less likely to perpetrate infidelity as people who had partners that scored at the mean on the scale. This effect did not differ across husbands and wives, B = .57, SE = 0.76, t(393) = 0.75, p = .46 or the attrition dummy-code, B = ?0.98, SE = 0.82, t(393) = ?1.19, p = https://datingranking.net/fr/rencontres-russe/ .24, but did differ across the two studies, B = ?2.00, SE = 0.57, t(393) = ?3.50, p < .01. Specifically, partner attachment avoidance was negatively associated with infidelity in Study 1, B = ?2.26, SE = 0.44, t(393) = ?5.09, p < .01, but not in Study 2, B = ?.26, SE= 0.39, t(393) = ?0.67, p = .50.

To check whether spouse connection insecurity moderated sometimes connection between individual insecurity and very own infidelity, we estimated a different one or two-top design you to definitely regressed reports regarding individual infidelity to all of the covariates, mean-centered items of the many four connection low self-esteem ratings, and all five you are able to affairs (molded because of the multiplying together brand new indicate-centered philosophy of details mixed up in telecommunications)-we.age., the fresh new Very own Accessory Anxiety X Partner Attachment Anxiety communication, brand new Own Connection Stress X Companion Attachment Prevention telecommunications, the latest Very own Accessory Reduction X Partner Attachment Nervousness telecommunications, as well as the Individual Connection Avoidance X Spouse Accessory Avoidance communications.

Abilities appear in Desk cuatro , where the chief outcomes and covariates are omitted to end redundancy having Desk step 3 . As can get noticed, just the Very own Connection Anxiety X Spouse Connection Anxiety communication is high. It communications don’t disagree across husbands and you can wives, B = ?0.20, SE = 0.30, t(385) = ?0.66, p = .51, the two training, B = ?0.forty-five, SE = 0.68, t(385) = ?0.67, p = .51, or perhaps the attrition dummy-code, B = ?0.66, SE = 0.57, t(385) = ?step one.15, p = .twenty-five.

Dining table cuatro

Entertaining Outcomes of Own Attachment Anxiety, Very own Accessory Avoidance, Spouse Connection Nervousness, and you will Companion Attachment Prevention to the Probability of Unfaithfulness

“She actually interested in me more. She never ever acts as happy observe myself whenever i been domestic. As to why cannot it really resemble it had been in the beginning?” My buddy recently registered toward to begin a few prominent phases out of matchmaking insecurity: rhetorical questioning. The interior studies continues on having, “She requires forever to respond to my messages. Does not she skip me personally when I’m went? She accustomed always make fun of inside my jokes. Do you really believe she actually is seeking others?”