It includes five points: positive proper care beliefs (“Worrying helps me to prevent trouble down the road”), opinions about uncontrollability and you may possibilities (“My alarming was unsafe personally”), intellectual skills (“I’ve nothing count on within my memories having conditions and you may labels”), general bad viewpoints (“Basically failed to manage a worrying imagine, right after which it just happened, it could be my blame”), and you will intellectual self-awareness (“I think a great deal in the my personal advice”). New metacognition questionnaire is actually obtained inside an effective 4 area measure regarding step 1 (“do not concur”) in order to 4 (“agree very much”) along with a good Chronbach’s alpha = .88. The newest metacognition survey has been utilized extensively inside the low-clinical trials eg cigarette smokers and Rockford escort pupils [49, 45]. An entire rating are calculated to make an index away from metacognition each participant.
The newest Obsessive-Obsessive Directory try a beneficial 42-goods worry about-statement survey, assessing the severity of various obsessions and compulsions of OCD when you look at the people . The fresh compulsive-fanatical collection include seven subscales that are included with laundry (“I clean my hand more frequently or more than necessary”), examining (“I go back once again to towns in order for I’ve perhaps not damage someone”), doubt (“Regardless of if I do some thing very carefully Personally i think that it isn’t a bit correct”), buying (“I get troubled when the others provides changed how i possess create my personal things”), obsessing (“I’ve found it difficult to control my personal viewpoint”), hoarding (“We collect things Really don’t you want”), and you will neutralising (“Personally i think I have to recite particular number”). It index is scored to your an effective 4 area Likert level, from 1 (“not really”) so you can 4 (“extremely”) and had good Chronbach’s leader = .88. A complete get is computed to make one to score for each and every participant associated with O-C attacks.
Processes
The possibility sample from university students took part in the study. Members was indeed first of all served with information regarding the analysis and you will provided the ability to make inquiries about any of it. Once giving consent, for every participant provided market advice, immediately after which have been offered new four surveys within the an excellent counterbalanced purchase to respond to from the her date. When the fellow member accomplished he/she are thanked and you will debriefed. All of the information and functions implemented brand new moral advice and procedures detailed by American Emotional Association and you may was in fact checked and you will accepted because of the College or university from Hertfordshire stability panel (Number:14149216).
Overall performance
Analysis is actually processed getting lost thinking, outliers and you can presumptions regarding analytical study ahead of one investigation . Most of the parameters had appropriate beliefs to own skewness and you may kurtosis no high outliers. Bivariate correlations of your countless all calculated indexes revealed positive and you can extreme associations between them (Dining table step one). The best connection are amongst the spiders out-of condition and you will attribute nervousness, with the newest organization anywhere between nervousness awareness, metacognition and you can O-C periods.
Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].
In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.