These tokens comprise: signs (e.grams., , >, /, +, ^, =), numerals (elizabeth.g., step 1, 2, 3) acronyms, shortenings and you may contractions (age.g., t, k, ff, ni, mn, nie, jy, gwn, s, lol; and that refer to: het, dat, ok/ik, even, niet, hem, niet, jij, gewoon, is actually, make fun of aloud; translations: they, one to, ok/We, to own a little while Footnote seven , maybe not, my, not, you, only, is), punctuation scratching (elizabeth.g., ! ? : ; however the period and you may comma), pronouns (age.grams., ik, jij, hem, hij, myself, je, jou; translations: I, you, your, he, myself, you/your), opinion-relevant adjectives/adverbs (elizabeth.grams., echt, lekker, mooi, goed, nieuwe, niks, leuk, zeker, mooie, super; translations: most, nice/delicious, nice/stunning, a great, the latest, nothing, nice/beautiful, nice/too, yes, nice, super), and you can interjection terms and conditions (e.g., ja, haha, nee, son, hoor, nou, hahaha, he, jaa, impress, jaaa, okay, bang, shit, wtf; translations: sure, haha, no, kid, you know, really, hahaha, hey/huh, yeah, inspire, okay). In summary, the language that occurred relatively more often pre-CLC depict mainly everyday code use, instance contractions, bizarre spellings, icons and you will profanity.
Profile 9 gift suggestions this new relative variations in POS incorporate pursuing the CLC, compared with Baseline-separated We and II
Table 5 gift ideas tokens one happened apparently with greater regularity article-CLC, these tokens are: stuff (we.elizabeth., de-, het, een; translations: feminine/masculine the, neuter the fresh new, a(n)), conjunctions (elizabeth.grams., dentro de, out-of, omdat, wanted, zodat; translations: and you will, otherwise, due to the fact, since, so as that), prepositions (e.grams., home, in, om, satisfied, over, tijdens, aan, tot; translations: through/by the, in, for/within, having, about/over, throughout, to/for the, until), auxiliary and linking verbs (age.grams., worden, hebben, zijn, moeten, kunnen, maken, willen; translations: be, provides, try, must, normally, create, want). Full, the fresh new tokens that took place seemingly with greater regularity article-CLC portray way more formal code need when compared to the pre-CLC tokens into the Desk 4.
Desk six presents bigrams that happened relatively more often pre-CLC. These types of bigrams mainly happened to be individual pronoun + verb combinations (we.e., ik ga, ik heb, ik ben, ik wil, ik dacht, heb je, ik moet, denk ik, ik kan, ik kom, ik had, ik try; translations: I want, We have, I am, Needs, I thought, perhaps you have, I must, In my opinion, I will, I come, I had, I found myself). Once again, the outcome suggest that there is seemingly a lot more informal language use, that’s, relatively more regular events from self-referential language, which implies a more individual and you will subjective language usage.
New bigrams that occurred apparently more frequently blog post-CLC, for the Desk eight, are generally prepositional sentences or preposition sugar daddy wanted Regina + article combinations (e.g., van de, van het, door de-, naar het, van een, om de, more de-, aan de-, more het, in het, satisfied het, fulfilled de-, om het, bij het, om een, voor het; translations: throughout the, about, because of the, for the, off good, concerning the, over the, throughout the, with the, about/along the, from the, inside the, to the), suggesting more detailed descriptions of one’s situation that’s labeled in the tweets. Notably, the introduction of even more prepositions also can explain the escalation in sentence duration following CLC.
POS investigation
The following hypothesis on the a prospective boost in the usage of adjectives, adverbs, blogs, conjunctions, and prepositions, is tested having fun with a beneficial POS research. Table 8 screens new relative wavelengths out-of POS groups. Brand new CLC had a heightened influence on POS use when compared to baseline variations. Particularly, the newest CLC triggered an increase in employing posts, conjunctives, and you can prepositions as compared to other POS classes. Which improve means the new CLC changed new syntactic structures regarding tweets, and that is backed by the fresh discovering that sentence size improved. Abruptly, the fresh cousin regularity of adverbs and adjectives don’t improve after this new CLC. As well, the difference between Standard-split up We and you can Standard-broke up II shows more variation anywhere between week step 3 and month 4 versus day step one and you may times dos. This means that a pattern throughout the code utilize initiated from the CLC.